Helen Doe, Et. Al. v. Thomas C. Horne, Et. Al., No. 23-16026 c/w No. 23-16030
Brief in support of defendants-appellants, arguing that allowing biological males to compete in women’s sports contradicts the underlying premise and legal basis for women’s sports and, thus,…
Brief in support of defendants-appellants, arguing that allowing biological males to compete in women’s sports contradicts the underlying premise and legal basis for women’s sports and, thus, threatens to destroy them altogether. Far from violating Title IX, Arizona’s Save Women’s Sports Act serves Title IX’s purpose in preserving equal opportunity for female athletes.